Atlanta Probate Lawyer Blog

A person is qualified under Georgia Law to serve as a Georgia probate court appointed Guardian and/or Conservator of a proposed ward if such person is:
1. Over the age of 18 years of age;
2. A Georgia resident; or a non-resident who is:

(a) related by lineal consanguinity to the ward;
(b) a legally adopted child or adoptive parent of the ward;
(c) a spouse, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, niece, or nephew of the ward, or someone elated by lineal consanguinity to any such person; or
(d) the spouse of a person otherwise qualified above; and

3. Has never been convicted of a felony.

A Petition for appointment of a Georgia Guardian and/or Conservator for the proposed ward will be filed with the GA County Probate Court in which the proposed ward is domiciled. This Petition requires either two Petitioners to sign the document or one Petitioner and the completed affidavit of a physician or psychologist licensed to practice in Georgia or a licensed clinical social worker, who has examined the proposed ward within 15 (fifteen) days prior to the filing of the Petition. In, Georgia, unless the alleged incapacitated person is indigent, the Petition must submit with a check to the GA County Clerk of Court for the filing fees. The filing fees vary slightly per each separate GA County Probate Court.

Continue reading " GEORGIA GUARDIANSHIP AND CONSERVATORSHIP PROCEDURES IN ATLANTA AREA PROBATE COURTS " »

Being an executor or administrator of a Georgia estate in probate court is no easy undertaking. In fact, as executor or administrator of a GA estate, you are stepping into a position ripe, ready and waiting for conflict and disharmony to develop among all the interested parties to the estate, or worse yet, parties that will use their influence to control others who do have an interest in the estate. To say the least, these matters are already emotional from the death of a loved one and now, as executor or administrator, you are in charge managing the often-greedy heirs or beneficiaries of the Georgia estate. At the very least, this can add substantial administrative and bureaucratic responsibilities to your life as well as significant anxiety and stress. Furthermore, these oftentimes come at a time when you may already be grieving and have your own affairs to manage. In almost all cases, this is further complicated by the significant administrative duties imposed by law on a GA executor or administrator and the fiduciary duties and liabilities that come with this position.

In most GA estates, both executors and administrators are frequently relatives or close friends of the deceased person (the decedent). This would seemingly be a plus; however, more often it turns out to be the starting place of many arguments, endless wrangling, power struggles and ultimately many GA Probate disputes, will contests and litigation proceedings. Many of these GA estate disputes and much of this GA probate litigation stems from the fact that many of the other members contesting the actions and alleged breach of the personal representative’s fiduciary duties are also frequently, family members, relatives, or close friends of the deceased person (the decedent). In fact, it is often the case that these family members, relatives and close friends stand to inherit assets of the Georgia estate or have some interest in the outcome of the distribution of assets.

Perhaps most importantly, acting as a personal representative gives you a fiduciary duty to the estate -- that is, you are legally responsible for ensuring that your financial decisions are made with complete information, according to the estate's best interests and as expeditiously considering the circumstances. This is the same fiduciary duty given to leaders of corporations, and like those leaders, you are legally liable for any lawsuit alleging that you have not met your fiduciary duties. This includes personal liability, which is beyond assets of the estate and not limited in any way, shape or form to the assets of the estate.

Continue reading " PREVENTION OF DISPUTES IN GEORGIA PROBATE COURT BY THE EXECUTOR OR ADMINISTRATOR – FORESIGHT, DETECTION, AND AVOIDANCE " »

Our Atlanta, Georgia, probate, estate, and fiduciary litigation law Firm has experienced a remarkable increase in the number of Georgia breach of fiduciary duty lawsuits we have litigated (or are presently litigating) over the past several years. Likewise, our wills, trusts, and estate attorneys have also seen a significant increase in the number of Georgia will contest lawsuits we have litigated (or are presently litigating).

Perhaps the increase in Georgia breach of fiduciary duty and will contest lawsuits, is in part, attributable to the economic downturn wherein many are watching their wallets and bank accounts, as well as the wallets and bank accounts of others (especially the elderly, incompetent, and incapacitated). I hope that there is an increased awareness into the widespread elder abuse, which is occurring throughout the state of Georgia. Inherently, this elder abuse involves deception and misrepresentation for financial gain. What is more, and I think a definite reason for the increase in cases involving litigation surrounding exploitation of the elderly, is some legal guidance from the Supreme Court of Georgia in a noted case, Bailey v. Edmundson, 280 Ga. 528, 630 S.E.2d 396 (2006). This case is important for a number of reasons which range from what factors make your case a practicable one, to who are the persons we need to keep a watchful eye on or are likely to take advantage of others for financial gain.

In several of my Atlanta, Georgia, probate and estate litigation cases, I use the Georgia Supreme Courts’ findings in Bailey v. Edmundson as my guidelines in assessing the legal implications of matters pertaining to any case involving undue influence as well as lack of capacity, misuse and abuse of power of attorney, and other such cases. Further, it should be noted that undue influence, lack of capacity, and other such factors are usually present together in the facts of any given case. As such, facts found in an undue influence case are likely to be found in a case involving lack of capacity (For Example: Lack of capacity is a condition, which oftentimes allows the undue influence to occur).

In Bailey v. Edmundson, the Georgia Supreme Court considered the following factors as relevant factors in determining undue influence:

Some of the relevant factors to consider in determining whether undue influence exists include:

• Was there a confidential relationship between the parties?

• Was the testator’s disposition of assets reasonable?

• What were the testator’s dealings and associations with the beneficiaries?

• What were the testator’s habits, motives, or feelings?

• What were the testator’s physical and mental strengths and weaknesses?

• What were the testator’s social relations?

• What were the testator’s business relations?

• Where there any other facts, circumstances, or conditions that establish unwarranted implementation of improper influence on the mind of the testator?

• Did any of the above factors result in the testator taking action to be the victim of the undue influence?

• What was the moral fiber of the people exercising the influence? What is bad? If so, how and why?

A transaction is presumed to be the result of undue influence when the parties are in a confidential relationship with each other and one party has a much greater mental ability than the other does, who may be aged or ill, and the one having the greater mental ability reaps the benefits of the transaction.

Case Study: In the case of Bailey v. Edmundson, 280 Ga. 528, 630 S.E.2d 396 (2006).
Mr. Bailey executed a will in October of 2003 naming his daughter as the personal representative of his will and the primary beneficiary. Approximately six months later, Mr. Bailey hired caregivers he met at church. Within a short period thereafter, Mr. Bailey executed a new will making specific bequests to these caregivers.

The Supreme Court found that there was ample evidence of undue influence for the reason that the caregivers did the following:

• The caregivers established a relationship with Mr. Bailey, which was confidential in nature;

• The caregivers were not related to him by blood or marriage; and,

• The caregivers took an active part in the creation of Mr. Bailey’s new will.

WHAT TO LOOK FOR AND WHO TO WATCH:

• Caregivers, caretakers, therapists, and handymen

• Religious persons such as pastors, preachers or those who convey that a testator’s place in heaven depends on the disposition of his monetary assets to a religious denomination or organization

• Distant relatives who were never close to the decedent who suddenly become interested in the decedent’s affairs

• Long lost “friends” who suddenly or suspiciously come into the testator’s life

• Persons who have quasi-intimate dealings with the decedent such as a former employee or employer, cosmetologist, banker, hairdresser, chauffer, body guard, fitness, rehabilitation or other such instructors or service providers

• The retaining of a new attorney or changing of attorneys (especially one picked or used by the person exerting undue influence)

• Any other persons or parties who are new to the testator’s life or that are acting in a different or unusual fashion

As a family member, or caring individual of a loved one, you have the ability under Georgia state law, and through other legal avenues, to seek legal assistance for anyone you feel could be, or has been, a victim of elder abuse. Our Firm encourages you to fight financial predators or other persons who seek illegal or unjust financial gain by exerting unwarranted influence or taking advantage of another’s weaknesses. The Adams Law Offices represents individuals and families seeking to bring to justice anyone who engages in unwarranted activity to the detriment of the lawful beneficiaries or heirs. Our Firm diligently and aggressively represents clients in probate and estate disputes and litigation involving wills, powers of attorney, or other legal documents.

Continue reading " ATLANTA, GEORGIA, ELDER LAW, PROBATE, AND ESTATE LITIGATION LAWYERS -- BEST PRACTICE GUIDANCE TO PROTECT THOSE WHO CANNOT PROTECT THEMSELVES -- BAILEY V. EDMUNDSON CASE STUDY " »

As an experienced Atlanta Probate Lawyer, I have repeatedly seen first-hand the frustration a beneficiary or heir can experience if the executor or administrator of a Georgia Probate Estate refuses or is unwilling to provide the beneficiaries or heirs with answers concerning the status of the estate. I also understand the difficulties a non-responsive, uncaring, or vindictive executor or administrator can cause by imposing their “perceived” powers upon the beneficiaries or heirs of an estate. Fortunately, for the beneficiary or heir subject this unjust behavior, these executors or administrators must carry out their fiduciary duties imposed pursuant to TITLE 53 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated entitled “WILLS, TRUSTS, AND ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES”.

Moreover, the Georgia executor or estate administrator has to move the Georgia estate administration process along expeditiously and in the best interests of all persons who are interested in the estate and with due regard for their respective rights. This implies a “reasonable” amount of time in which matters are to move forward.

Nevertheless, regardless of the high standards and accountability to which a fiduciary is held, if you do not seek legal counsel to address these matters and compel answers, the Georgia Probate Courts will not likely hold accountable these Georgia Estate Fiduciaries. As a beneficiary or heir, it is up to you to seek relief by asserting your entitlement to answers and compelling answers due under Georgia Probate law and using the powers of the Georgia Probate Courts to obtain answers. The fact remains, even if you have signed documents giving the executor or administrator broad powers and waivers under Letters Testamentary or Letters of Administration issued by the Georgia Probate Court, you can still request and receive answers from the executor or administrator of the estate. However, matters have become much more complex and it is wise to seek the counsel of an experienced Atlanta Probate Lawyer or Atlanta Estate Litigation Law Firm.

Continue reading " AS A BENEFICIARY OR HEIR OF A GEORGIA PROBATE ESTATE, YOU ARE ENTITLED TO AN INVENTORY AND ACCOUNTING IN GEORGIA PROBATE COURT " »